Swift v. People ex rel. Powers
Appellate Court of Illinois
Mandamus, to compel the issuing of a saloon license. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. James Goggin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1896.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
It is urged, by counsel for the relators, that as the keeping of a saloon is recognized by the law as a legitimate occupation, and the method to be pursued by those desiring to obtain a license to sell liquors is definitely pointed out, when one asking for a license has complied with the law, the authorities have no discretion to refuse because the place where the saloon is to be, is one in which the mayor is of the opinion such a store ought not to be kept.
It is urged that the mayor can not, in his discretion, deprive one neighborhood, or any citizen resident therein, of the right to there…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Chicago v. RumpffIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- The People Ex Rel. Millard v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Zanone v. Mound CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Sullivan v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- City of East St. Louis v. WehrungIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harrison v. People ex rel. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Smyth v. ButtersUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Greencastle v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Noble v. City Council of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrison v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.