Legal Opinion

In re De La Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 9, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Sitro De La Cruz, was admitted to the practice *113of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on July 26, 1988, as Sitro Prado De La Cruz. Respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department at all times relevant to these proceedings.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has moved for an order suspending respondent immediately from the practice of law until further order of this Court based upon 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) and (iii) due to his willful failure to cooperate with the Committee in its…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re ValdesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re LubellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re SiskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re De La CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API