Legal Opinion

In re Siskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 12, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Barry S. Siskin was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 25, 1980. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained a law office within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent was suspended from the practice of law on June 4, 2009 (65 AD3d 58 [2009]) for failing to respond to questions posed by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee concerning transfers from his escrow account and an unexplained decrease of funds in the account.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee is now…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In re De La CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re SiskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of RosabiancaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. In re AnyikwaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re AnyikwaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Kommeh v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Kommeh v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API