Legal Opinion

Lehigh Const. Co. v. Housing Auth. of City of Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 7, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Francis, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether N. J. S. A. 40 :50 — 1, which requires competitive bidding on contracts for public work where the amount involved exceeds $2500, applies to a low-rent housing project to be developed under the Federal “Turnkey” method established pursuant to 42 U. S. C. A. § 1401 et seq. (Chapter 8 — Low-Rent Housing).

If the New Jersey statute is applicable to the construction project involved here, it would have been necessary for the defendant Authority to publicly advertise for bids on the work and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Campbell v. Bellevue Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
  2. Floral Park Tenants Ass'n v. Project Holding, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. DeLarmi v. Borough of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ASBURY PARK v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
  5. Brown Strober Building Supply Corp. v. Fannew Realty, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API