Legal Opinion
Rath v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 15, 1990No. 13-89-349-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
Arlene Rath sued the State of Texas for damages for personal injuries she received in a one-car accident on a State highway. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the State based on a finding that notice of the claim was not presented within the statutory six-month period. By three points of error, Rath appeals, contending that the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Rath was injured in a one-car accident on a State highway on August 1, 1985. She filed suit against the State of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ford v. City State Bank of Palacios, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Dinh v. Harris County Hospital District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Eubank v. First National Bank of Bellville, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Cameron County Savings Ass'n v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Heirs of Del Real v. EasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.