Legal Opinion

Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. McKinstry Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 8, 1990No. 23231-2-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

McKinstry Company (McKinstry) appeals from the trial court's ruling that the Washington Insurance Guaranty Association (WIGA) is entitled to reduce the amount payable on a claim arising from the insolvency of an excess insurer by the policy limits of the underlying primary coverage.

I

The facts are undisputed. In October 1984, Cossie Bur-russ sued McKinstry for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of McKinstry's negligence. McKinstry carried primary insurance coverage with CNA Insurance Company (CNA). The policy issued by CNA had a liability limit of $500,000 for bodily injuries.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Condit v. Lewis Refrigeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Prutzman v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stewart Carpet Service, Inc. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bullock v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Guaranty National InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bell v. SlezakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Union Carbide Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. R & R Industrial Park, L.L.C. v. Utah Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API