Legal Opinion

Concienne v. Asante

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 2015No. 123280L3; A154121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim of professional negligence against defendant Kather. The trial court concluded that plaintiffs amended complaint did not relate back to the date of the original complaint and, as a consequence, the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, we must decide how a court should apply ORCP 23 C to an incomplete complaint. We conclude that the amended complaint relates back to the original complaint, because the revised claim against Kather “arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Caplener v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Griffith v. BlattOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Johnson v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API