Legal Opinion
Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 27, 1940No. 7103, 7104PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
The original complaint charged defendant with infringement of United States Patent to Mead, No. 1,736,544, issued November 19, 1929, on an application filed August 24, 1927. Subsequently, by supplemental complaint, plaintiff charged defendant with infringement of United States Patents to Johnson, No. 2,129,374, and to Cohen, No. 2,140,311, both of which were issued after the filing of the original complaint, on applications filed before that time on the respective dates of August 17, 1934, and July 23, 1932. Plaintiff does not manufacture or sell cigar lighters. It is in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- General Electric Co. v. Sangamo Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Dominion Magnesium Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Casco Products Corporation v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.