Weber v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that the notice of appeal was not filed within the sixty-day period prescribed by Section 547, General Code. City of Dayton v. Public Utilities Commission, 111 Ohio St., 476, 145 N. E., 849; Conway, Jr., et al., Recrs., v. Public Utilities Commission, 133 Ohio St. 530, 14 N. E. (2d), 929; Finfrock v. Public Utilities Commission, 154 Ohio St., 21.
Appeal dismissed.
'Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Stewart, Taft and Faught, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Dayton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Finfrock v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Conway v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1961