Legal Opinion

Weber v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1950No. 32289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that the notice of appeal was not filed within the sixty-day period prescribed by Section 547, General Code. City of Dayton v. Public Utilities Commission, 111 Ohio St., 476, 145 N. E., 849; Conway, Jr., et al., Recrs., v. Public Utilities Commission, 133 Ohio St. 530, 14 N. E. (2d), 929; Finfrock v. Public Utilities Commission, 154 Ohio St., 21.

Appeal dismissed.

'Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Stewart, Taft and Faught, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Finfrock v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Conway v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1961