Dixon v. State

Phipps, Judge.

After a jury trial, Christian Dixon was convicted of obstructing or hindering a law enforcement officer by spitting on the officer’s face. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, by failing to grant a mistrial when a state’s witness placed his character in issue, and by rejecting his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Dixon has shown no reversible error, and we affirm.

1. Dixon contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. We disagree.

Viewed in a light to…