Love v. United States

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of obtaining by false pretenses several cases of beer from a local liquor dealer.1 They ask this court to reverse their convictions upon two main grounds.

First, appellants contend that the trial judge’s instructions to the jury on presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt were inadequate. We have examined the instructions and find that the law governing the jury’s consideration of this case was sufficiently explained. Further, at the completion of the charge the court inquired if further instructions were desired, and appellants’…