Legal Opinion

Kleinschmidt v. White

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 1932No. 20860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This is an action brought in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county by R. A. Kleinschmidt and Marvin T. Johnson, law partners, doing business as Kleinschmidt & Johnson, against Daniel W. White and Peter Cope White, physicians, doing business under the firm name of AYhite & White, to recover the sum of $1,599, balance due on, open account for legal services rendered defendants.

Defendants admit that plaintiffs are law partners and that plaintiff Johnson was engaged by them and in their behalf performed certain legal services. They allege that at the time they employed Johnson they had no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. N. Rogers & Sons v. BatchelorSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Snyder Manufacturing Co. v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Eggleston v. BoardmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. McNair ex rel. White v. PlattIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Thomas v. StetsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bossert Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Great Southwest Life Ins. Co. v. Pruitt HarpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API