Legal Opinion
State v. Ahumada
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 8, 1980No. 2 CA-CR 1824-2PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This appeal challenges the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. We find the admission of one of appellant's statements taken in violation of Miranda was error and reverse. Because the other issues raised on appeal may arise on retrial, we will also dispose of them.
Mr. Italiano, night manager of Howard Johnson’s Motel in Tucson, called police officers at 11:00 p. m. because appellant had not paid his room charge for that night. Appellant had stayed in the room the previous evening but had failed either to check out at 12:00 noon or pay in advance, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Leamon Lee CroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Chester A. ParizoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Russell B. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Commonwealth v. BrundidgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- State v. WeekleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- People v. MontoyaColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BrassMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.