Legal Opinion
Moore v. McCuen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 13, 1994No. 94-434PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ernie E. Wright, Special Justice.
Appellant, William D. Moore, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his complaint for a writ of mandamus to prevent the election in 1994 of anyone to the seat he now holds as state senator for Arkansas Senate District No. 2.
Appellant was elected in November 1992 to a four-year term and assumed office in January 1993. In compliance with Article 8, Section 6, of the Arkansas Constitution as amended by Amendment 23, the thirty-five members of the senate, all of whom were elected in November 1992, drew lots to determine the eighteen senators…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Donatelli v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Donoho v. DonohoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Board of Trustees v. StodolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Steward v. StatlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.