Legal Opinion

Hinchman v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1903No. 4698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William H. Snell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*200The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the.lower court to recover upon five promissory notes. The defendants appeared separately and demurred to the amended complaint, upon the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and also upon the ground that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law. These demurrers were sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand upon his complaint, and the action was dismissed. Prom the order of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.

It will he necessary to consider only the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanna v. KassonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Garrett v. Bicklin, Winzer & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Brigham-Hopkins Co. v. GrossWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Valerie J. SlotkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Farm Credit Bank v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State Bank of Goldendale v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Adc Venture 2011-2, Llc v. Mtb Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API