Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Bicklin, Winzer & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 4, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon Charles H. Phelps, Judge. Action for damages for the wrongful seizure of property on attachment. A demurrer to the petition was sustained and- judgment entered for defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

I. Appellant’s abstract presents two assignments of error; either of which, if sustained, would reverse the judgment: (1) The action of the court in refusing a change of venue; (2) the sustaining of the demurrer to the petition.

i appeal-strik exceptionsof Appellant’s abstract contains no bill of exceptions, and appellees present an additional abstract, in which a kill of exceptions is set forth; and we first n°lice a m°ii°n to strike from the additional abstract this bill of exceptions. We think there are no reasons for striking the bill of exceptions from the record; but, as a discussion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Goodnow v. StrykerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. Steel v. BryantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Castner v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Gardner v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Faivre v. MandercheidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Hintrager v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API