Legal Opinion
Roe v. Snyder
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 3, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-13353PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY (Dkt. 26); DENYING DEFENDANT WORTHY’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 33); AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. 34)
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge
This case concerns Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.721 et seq. Recently, the Sixth Circuit issued Does # 1-5 v. Snyder, *701834 F.3d 696 (6th Cir. 2016), reh’g denied, (Sept. 15, 2016), which held that certain provisions of SORA, added by amendment, cannot be applied retroactively without violating the Ex Post Facto…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arkona, LLC v. Cheboygan, County ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Roe v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Eagle Mist CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021