Legal Opinion

Jones v. Industrial Health, Accident & Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1936No. Appeal, 291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the beneficiary of a policy of insurance in the sum of $250, issued by the defendant. Maude Jones, the plaintiff, is the mother of Eugene Jones, the insured, who was born on March 6, 1935. She caused the baby’s life to be insured with the defendant in the sum of $250 on March 18, 1935, when the baby was twelve days old. Twenty-two days later, viz, April 9,1935, the child died.

The defense was that the insured was not in good health at the time of issuance of the policy.

The trial March 25, 1936, in the Municipal Court of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Baldi v. Metropolitan InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Borgon v. John Hancock M. Life Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Lebanon Mutual Insurance v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Holleran v. Life Assurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lederer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Meth v. United Benefit Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Oliver v. Industrial Health, Accident & Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API