Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Doe)
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1985No. 84 CV 4756PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This is a motion by petitioner, John Doe, one of two partners in a consulting firm, to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). The subpoena is directed to petitioner as custodian of partnership records, and commands production of books and records from January 1, 1981 to the present, including cash receipts and disbursements, general ledgers, cancelled checks, bank statements and partnership tax returns. For the reasons developed below, the Court will conduct a hearing on the applicability of the act of production doctrine.
Fa…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 13, 1984District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- In re 25 Grand JuryDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. KalitenkoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of James Gilbert BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of James Gilbert BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.