Legal Opinion

Kadiri Apampa v. Patrick Layng, George Jackson, Iii, and Daniel Dodds

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 8, 1999No. 97-1527PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

Shortly before pleading guilty to conspiracy to distribute heroin, Kadiri Apampa brought this civil suit against two assistant U.S. attorneys and a DEA agent who had been involved in his prosecution. Apampa’s complaint, prepared without legal assistance, claims that the defendants made false statements about him in applications (which were granted) for permission to tap his phone conversations. The particular statement of which he complains, which he calls not only false but libelous, is that a “U.S. Customs source of information alleged that ... Apam-pa acted as a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walter Hill v. Joseph MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Beaudry v. TeleCheck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. VanMeterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Bansal v. RussDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Tapley v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API