Legal Opinion
United States v. VanMeter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 29, 2002No. 00-6456PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Brent Eugene VanMe-ter, the defendant, of accepting a bribe in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666. On appeal, Mr. VanMeter asserts the following: (1) the trial court should have suppressed wiretap communications obtained pursuant to a court order that included unlawful references to offenses not subject to wiretap investigation; (2) government agents violated the “necessity” requirement of the federal wiretapping statute; (3) the government violated the nondisclosure requirement of the federal wiretapping statute; (4) there was insufficient evidence the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Paul Corrado (98-2269) Nove Tocco (98-2270) Vito William Giacalone (98-2365)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jesus Zambrana, Sr., Charles Cole and Jay ZambranaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Cline, TimothyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Gonzalez-EdezaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Ramirez-EncarnacionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.