Legal Opinion
Amusement & Music Operators Ass'n v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 16, 1982No. Nos. 80-2837, 81-1324 and 81-1482PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
On January 5, 1981, the Copyright Royalty Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) published its final rule establishing the royalty fee payable by jukebox operators for the public performance of copyrighted nondramatic musical works. 46 Fed.Reg. 884 (1981); see 37 C.F.R. §§ 306.1-306.4 (1981). Various participants in these consolidated cases now seek judicial review of the Tribunal’s rule, claiming inter alia that the fee established by the rule is either too high or too low and thus is not supported by the record or is arbitrary and capricious and violates the statutory requirement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Chicago, Illinois v. Federal Power Commission, Pipeline Production Group, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- The Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases American Public Gas Association v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Committee for an Independent P-I v. Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Recording Industry Ass'n of America v. Librarian of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Amusement and Music Operators Association v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, Broadcast Music, Inc., Party-Respondent. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, Amusement and Music Operators Association v. Copyright Royalty TribunalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Committee For An Independent P-I v. The Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.