Legal Opinion

Murray v. Nines

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 9, 2025No. 1:22-cv-01094Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND GEORGE MURRAY : Petitioner : v. : Civil Action No.: DKC-22-1094 JEFF NINES, Warden, et al. : Respondents : MEMORANDUM OPINION George Murray, Petitioner, a Maryland State prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF Nos. 1, 6, 6-1 (the “Petition”). Respondents, Warden Jeff Nines and the Maryland Attorney General, filed an answer to the Petition asserting that the claims are either procedurally defaulted, non-cognizable, or lack merit. ECF No. 10. No hearing is required to resolve the…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API