Legal Opinion
(PC) Blair v. Viss
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 1, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00670Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERMAINE BLAIR, No. 2:22-cv-0670 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VISS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants used excessive force, failed to protect him, and 19 retaliated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. For the reasons set forth below, the 20 undersigned will vacate the August 7, 2023, findings and recommendations…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.