Lambert v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for forgery; from Haralson superior court — Judge Bartlett. July 30, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
1. It was not error for the court to refuse to receive the verdict returned by the jury, which was not in the proper form, nor to instruct them to return to their room and bring the verdict back in form, telling them what the form should be if they found from the evidence that the defendant was guilty of that oifense. Brantley v. State, 87 Ga. 149 (4), 151, 155 (13 S. E. 257); Pool v. State, 87 Ga. 526, 530 (13 S. E. 556).
2. The verdict as finally returned by the jury and received by the court was as follows: “We, the jury, find the defendant, W. T. Lambert, guilty of uttering, publishing,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meador v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Pool v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- O'Connell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Couch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Ezzard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maltbie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- State v. WashingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Dunbar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Littlefield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Gober v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.