Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. Feinberg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1932No. 21437. Writ deniedPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

On April 15, 1932, at the April term, a petition for a writ of mandamus in the name of the People was presented by the Chicago Bar Association, as relator, with a motion for leave to file it, and leave being granted it was filed. Michael Feinberg, who was named as respondent, appeared forthwith and demurred to the petition. Briefs were filed, and on April 16 the cause was argued by counsel for the respective parties and was submitted for decision upon such argument and the briefs filed. The prayer of the petition was that a writ of mandamus be issued directed to the respondent, commanding him…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hake v. StrubelIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Myers v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Berkowitz v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Greene v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. JacobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. LindsayIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hirschfield v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. The PEOPLE v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API