Legal Opinion

Paek v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 20, 2015No. 14-3982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RENDELL, Circuit Judge:

We address the proper interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) — specifically, whether the conditional nature of an alien’s lawful permanent resident status affects his eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). Under § 212(h)’s aggravated felony bar, “an alien who has previously been admitted to the United States as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence,” who is later convicted of an aggravated felony, is statutorily ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility. Id. We must decide whether…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Charles Eleri v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Hector RengifoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Mohammed v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API