Legal Opinion

Mohammed v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 24, 2019No. 17-3202Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3202 Mohammed v. Whitaker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jigme Wangchuck v. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. RIVASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
  3. ABOSIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
  4. Paek v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. Husic v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API