Legal Opinion

Reinhold v. Mallery

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 7, 1991No. 90-438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, John Mallery, appeals from the Superior Court’s (Dickson, J.) order requiring the defendant to pay a real estate commission to the plaintiff, Reinhold Associates (Reinhold). As he did before the trial court, the defendant argues on appeal that Reinhold, as the defendant’s real estate agent, breached its fiduciary duty to him, thus foreclosing any claim by Reinhold for its commission. We agree, and therefore reverse the trial court’s order.

On July 18, 1986, the defendant entered into a listing agreement with Reinhold, a fully licensed real estate brokerage firm, wherein Reinhold…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. Global Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Wilson v. AtwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
  3. Benway v. ColeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wainwright Bank & Trust Co. v. BoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Wainwright Bank v. BoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API