Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Atwood

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

The case was sent to a referee, who found certain facts, but did not return a general verdict. The verdict for the plaintiff, found by the court from the facts reported by the referee, adds nothing to the plaintiff’s case. The right of the plaintiff to a judgment depends upon the sufficiency of the facts found by the referee. Crawford v. Forristall, 57 N. H. 102. If those facts do not establish a right to recover there would be a judgment for the defendant, unless the case should be recommitted for further findings. It is not the province of the court to add to the findings reported. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Forsyth v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. NCNB National Bank v. Bridgewater Steam Power Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
  2. Tilton v. SharpeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  3. Gleason v. Elbthal Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Connolly v. Manchester Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  5. Reinhold v. MallerySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API