Legal Opinion

Apodaca v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-107PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court committed an error of law in refusing to order a sentence in an attempted sexual assault case to run concurrently with a prior sentence which Vincent Apodaca (Apodaca) was serving on parole at the time of the later conviction. Apodaca’s appeal is taken from an order denying his motion presented pursuant to WYO.R.CRIM.P. 35 in which he sought correction of an illegal sentence. We hold that the sentence is not an illegal sentence, and Wyo.R.Crim.P. 35 is not an appropriate vehicle to present the issue. The order of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bishop v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Capwell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. DeSpain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chester Loyde Bird v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. SandovalColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Vena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Moore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API