Sheriff v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberfiardt, Judge.
1. “Gross receipts,” as used in an insurance policy in providing a method of determining the premium to be paid, is not an ambiguous term. The words mean the whole, entire total receipts, as opposed to “net receipts.” Taylor v. Rosenthal, 308 Ky. 4 (213 SW2d 435). And under ordinary basic methods of handling accounts the term must be taken to include the whole total gross receipts without any deductions. Commonwealth v. Koppers Co., 397 Pa. 523 (156 A2d 328); Laclede Gas Co. v. City of St. Louis, 363 Mo. 842 (253 SW2d 832). And see N. Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Wright, 31 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Laclede Gas Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Commonwealth v. Koppers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Taylor v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- New York Life Insurance v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rossville Vending MacHine Corp. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- LaSalle National Insurance v. Executive Auto Leasing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Insurance Agency of Glynn County, Inc. v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Pendley v. JesseeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Cyncal Steel Fabricators Inc., et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.