Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Kishi

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1927No. 682—4233; Motion No. 6984PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The Humble Oil & Refining Company insists that the holding made in our original opinion (276 S. W. 190) denies to .a cotenant the right to the use and enjoyment of the land owned in cotenancy. No such 'holding was intended, and we think the opinion makes it clear that no such holding is .made. The entry upon this land as a coten-:ant of Kishi would have been lawful and -would have occasioned no injury to Kishi’s right to the value of his property. The entry made upon this land was unlawful, not because the company had no right to make entry, but because the entry made was in denial of Kishi’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. KishiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Kishi v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Environmental Processing Systems, L.C. v. Fpl Farming Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Byrom v. PendleyTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. HowthTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Kidd v. HoggettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API