Perkins v. Terrell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Forfeiture of -recognizance, from city court of Washington— Judge Hardeman. February 6, 1906.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
Perkins was indicted by the grand jury of Wilkes-county and was arrested on a bench warrant, and Hill and Crouch, as his securities, entered into a recognizance by which they bound themselves to be responsible for the appearance of their principal, Perkins, at the next superior court, and “from day to day and term to- term,” to answer to the indictment, and “not to depart thence without the leave of said court.” The indictment was transferred to the city court of Washington, and the recognizance or appearance bond went with it as matter of law. At the October term, 1904, of said city court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bethune v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Roberts v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Colquitt v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Griffin v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
- Lamb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Garner v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Andrews v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- American Surety Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Davis v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.