Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hardwick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1925No. 15308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The mere producing into open court by the surety of the principal in a recognizance bond at the hour and minute previously set by the judge as the time for imposing sentence after conviction, *501although accompanied, with the expression from the surety, directed to the judge: “Here he is [referring to the principal]; I have brought him back as you said,” does not show a compliance with the bond under which the surety was answerable for the. principal’s presence in court until after sentence is passed. Nor does ‘a compliance with such order of the court amount to a surrender of the principal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Andrews v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Worth v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Haggerty v. IannacciMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  4. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API