Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Compugraphic Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 21, 1983No. 4968-0-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

On April 18, 1978, Mr. and Mrs. Barnard, who owned a commercial printing business, contracted with Compugraphic Corporation to purchase a typeset machine—the EditWriter 7500. This action was brought by the Barnards against Compugraphic for damages due to malfunctioning of the EditWriter and two replacement machines. After a bench trial, the court awarded damages to the Barnards, finding Compugraphic breached implied and express warranties and negligently misrepresented the capability, suitability, reliability, serviceability, and profitability of the EditWriter. Both parties appeal from that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Burrus v. Itek Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. V. C. Edwards Contracting Co. v. Port of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Eagle Point Condominium Owners Ass'n v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City Nat. Bank of Charleston v. WellsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API