Legal Opinion

Valenti v. Purdy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover property damage resulting from a fire, defendants Karen Ryan and Barbara Menke appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme *1020Court, Orange County, dated August 22, 1978, as denied their motion and cross motion, respectively, for summary judgment as to them. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements, and appellants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment are granted. In order to defeat a motion for summary judgment the opponent must present evidentiary facts sufficient to raise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Chickering v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grossman v. Laurence Handprints-N.J., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Parks v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Dartmouth Plan, Inc. v. ValleNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kaloz v. RiscoNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API