Kaloz v. Risco
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony J. Ferraro, J.
Plaintiffs make this application to vacate a decision, order and judgment of this court and for reargument and renewal of the motion for summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Swim and Play Company.
Upon the original application the only opposition was an affidavit of plaintiffs’ attorney which failed to set forth evidentiary facts to sustain a cause of action. (Freedman v Chemical Constr. Corp., 43 NY2d 260; Ehrlich v American Moninger Greenhouse Mfg. Corp., 26 NY2d 255; Mintz v Long Is. Daily Press Pub. Co., 75 AD2d 595; Valenti v Purdy, 71…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.