Legal Opinion · Dissent

Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2010No. 06-36059Published

1Dissent

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge,

joined by KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and KLEINFELD, GOULD, TALLMAN, CALLAHAN, BEA and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc:

The majority holds that a former Attorney General of the United States may be personally liable for promulgating a policy under which his subordinates took actions expressly authorized by law. Judge Bea’s dissent from the panel decision clearly and ably describes the several legal errors the panel makes in reaching this startling conclusion. See al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949, 981-1000 (9th Cir.2009) (Bea, J.,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API