Dunigan Tool & Supply Co. v. Carroll
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
The question in this appeal is whether certain contracts for the drilling of oil wells constitute a mining partnership as a matter of law between C. M. Carroll and Cardinal Oil Company, so as to render the latter liable as a partner for certain materials sold by appellant, Dunigan Tool & Supply Company, to Carroll, and used by him as necessary materials in drilling the oil wells.
On July 8, 1929, George D. Morgan, as the owner of an ordinary seven-eighths oil and gas lease on two tracts of land, executed a written contract with Carroll, as contractor, to drill a test well for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Gardner v. WesnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Bokum Resources Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1983
- Southern Underwriters v. GariepyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Snodgrass v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Browne v. Sabine MacHine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.