Legal Opinion

Dunigan Tool & Supply Co. v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1933No. 7843PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

The question in this appeal is whether certain contracts for the drilling of oil wells constitute a mining partnership as a matter of law between C. M. Carroll and Cardinal Oil Company, so as to render the latter liable as a partner for certain materials sold by appellant, Dunigan Tool & Supply Company, to Carroll, and used by him as necessary materials in drilling the oil wells.

On July 8, 1929, George D. Morgan, as the owner of an ordinary seven-eighths oil and gas lease on two tracts of land, executed a written contract with Carroll, as contractor, to drill a test well for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gardner v. WesnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Long Island Lighting Co. v. Bokum Resources Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1983
  3. Southern Underwriters v. GariepyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Snodgrass v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Browne v. Sabine MacHine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API