Black v. Acers
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant's suit against defendant contractors was based upon an alleged failure to build a house according to plans and specifications; and the jury answers were favorable to plaintiff, fixing damages in the sum of $1,500. Thereafter, defendants' motion non obstante veredicto was heard and sustained, followed by judgment that plaintiff take nothing, and this appeal. Jury findings were, in effect, that A. E. Acers had failed to construct the dwelling and improvements at 3453 Amherst Street in substantial compliance with plans and specifications, and to meet Federal Housing Administration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- City of San Antonio v. McKenzie Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Henry & DilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Williams v. Mount Hood Ry. & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Ghr Energy Corporation, Southern States Exploration, Inc., and S.A. Holditch & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Delhi Pipeline Corporation v. Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Lake LBJ Municipal Utility District v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Longview Construction & Development, Inc. v. Loggins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Lake LBJ Municipal Utility District v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.