Barrett v. Rietta
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.
The bill in this cause, later amended, was filed by Rietta and numerous other “fruit and fresh vegetable” retail dealers in the city of Birmingham against the city commissioners of that municipality and Hr. J. D. Dowling, the health officer. The amended bill’s design is to invoke equity’s injunctive process to restrain these authorities or officers from enforcing sections 1099, 1101, and 1119 of the Code of the city of Birmingham, upon the theory that such sections, for the violation of which penalties are imposed, are invalid, and also to restrain the municipal authorities from effecting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. Orr.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Brown v. Mayor of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Town of Greensboro v. EhrenreichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- City of Montgomery v. Orpheum Taxi Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- State v. NormandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Gilchrist Drug Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- City of Trussville v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Nesby v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- DeCarlo v. Jefferson County Board of HealthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963