Legal Opinion

State v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 8, 1964No. 49985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

Lola Lorene Perkins and her husband, the Reverend Matthew Perkins, were charged under the second section of the rather new and simplified “stealing” statute; “It shall he unlawful for any person to intentionally steal the property of another, either without his consent or 'by means of deceit.” RSMo 1959, § 560.156, V.A.M.S. While the prosecuting witness, Robert N. Amacker, and his Hollybrook Land Company claim to have been bilked of the total sum of $267,-800.82, the information charges that Lola and her husband directly and deceitfully stole the sum of $79,661. Upon her…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ZammarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. State v. StockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. State v. NewhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API