Legal Opinion

Metropolitan National Bank v. Hutchinson Realty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1930No. 22122. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action to recover for the use and conversion of apartment house furniture. The cause was tried to the court sitting without a jury, and resulted in a judgment dismissing the action, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.

' The respondent, Hutchinson Realty Company, leased the Van Siclen Apartment House January 22, 1924, to Magnus Edgren for a five-year period. The furniture placed in the building was owned by the lessee Edgren who, to secure the payment of the rentals reserved in the lease, executed to respondent realty company a chattel mortgage upon the furniture. In March,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mosler v. WoodellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Exeter Co. v. Samuel Martin, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Heath Northwest, Inc. v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Yakima Valley Motors, Inc. v. Webb Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hargis v. Mel-Mad CorporationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API