Breckenridge Hotels Corp. v. Leachman
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DONNELLY, Judge.
This case involves a tax assessment on real property belonging to appellants. Appellants’ “First Amended Petition for Refund of Tax Paid Under Protest,” filed under § 139.031, RSMo 1969, was dismissed by the trial court on the grounds it “fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted * *
There are several issues raised and briefed by the parties. We decide only the question whether the petition states a claim upon which relief can be granted, under § 139.031, against George C. Leachman, the Collector of St. Louis County, Missouri.
According to the petition, appellants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
3Cited by17 opinions
- B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Savage v. State Tax Com'n of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- C & D Investment Co. v. BestorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Associated Industries of Missouri v. State Tax Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States/Marriott Hotels, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.