Legal Opinion

Breckenridge Hotels Corp. v. Leachman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 12, 1978No. 60298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

This case involves a tax assessment on real property belonging to appellants. Appellants’ “First Amended Petition for Refund of Tax Paid Under Protest,” filed under § 139.031, RSMo 1969, was dismissed by the trial court on the grounds it “fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted * *

There are several issues raised and briefed by the parties. We decide only the question whether the petition states a claim upon which relief can be granted, under § 139.031, against George C. Leachman, the Collector of St. Louis County, Missouri.

According to the petition, appellants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Savage v. State Tax Com'n of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. C & D Investment Co. v. BestorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Associated Industries of Missouri v. State Tax Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States/Marriott Hotels, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API