Legal Opinion

C & D Investment Co. v. Bestor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 10, 1981No. 60679-60693PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

This case involves construction of § 139.-031, RSMo 1978, the “tax protest statute.” 1

Taxpayers in these fifteen consolidated cases individually own twenty-three parcels of real estate in Jackson County, Missouri. In 1976, each taxpayer paid a portion of his property taxes under protest pursuant to the procedure set out in § 139.031. Although most of the protests involved taxes currently due, there were six past due tax bills involving 1973-1975 tax years. The assessed valuations had not changed during the applicable years. The taxpayers in their protest letters identified six…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Cupples Hesse Corporation v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. State v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. American Hog Company v. County of ClintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Savage v. State Tax Com'n of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Westglen Village Associates v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Buck v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. School District of Kansas City v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API