C & D Investment Co. v. Bestor
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Judge.
This case involves construction of § 139.-031, RSMo 1978, the “tax protest statute.” 1
Taxpayers in these fifteen consolidated cases individually own twenty-three parcels of real estate in Jackson County, Missouri. In 1976, each taxpayer paid a portion of his property taxes under protest pursuant to the procedure set out in § 139.031. Although most of the protests involved taxes currently due, there were six past due tax bills involving 1973-1975 tax years. The assessed valuations had not changed during the applicable years. The taxpayers in their protest letters identified six…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Cupples Hesse Corporation v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- American Hog Company v. County of ClintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Savage v. State Tax Com'n of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Westglen Village Associates v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Buck v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- School District of Kansas City v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.