Legal Opinion
Bregan v. The John Stuart Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 19, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01823Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 JAMES BREGAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01823-LB 12 Plaintiffs, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN 13 v. PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS 14 THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 15, 17 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT 18 The plaintiffs rented a home in the Presidio of San Francisco, a federal enclave administered 19 by the Presidio Trust. In June 2021, the defendants allegedly performed a roof replacement 20 without proper precautions, resulting in lead…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.