State v. Carlson

1. Recognizing that the convictions in this case cannot be sustained unless the facts bring it within one of the exceptions set forth in Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767, 87 S. Ct. 1414, 18 L. ed. 2d 515 (1967), the majority holds that there was evidence of pandering which sets the material aside from that protected under the Redrup rule. It states that the selection of material placed in the windows together with the signs “YOU CANNOT BE ARRESTED while Shopping our Store” and “ADULTS ONLY, You must be 18 to Enter Store” constitute pandering as a matter of law.

The majority raises for the…