Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Apfel

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 6, 1998No. CV 96-4342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Donna Kendall, seeks judicial review, pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of a final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits. Both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The issue presented to the Court is whether the Commissioner’s decision is based upon the correct legal standards and supported by substantial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
Paul E. Dumas v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
Schisler v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Perez v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002