Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Capital Grain & Feed Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 4, 1929No. Nos. 4982, 4983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
These appeals are from judgments of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia granting writs of mandamus against the Interstate Commerce Commission. The two eases involve the same issue, were submitted together, and we will treat them as a single case. The cases relate to rates on grain and grain products in carloads from points north and west of Montgomery. Ala., and Nashville, Tenn.
The Commission, on the evidence submitted, on November 27, 1926, made reports in these eases finding that the rates complained of were, and for the future would be, unreasonable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Donner Steel Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- George Allison & Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- George Allison & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935